(Instead I now invariably duck out to an external merge tool and deal with it visually, even though I know it's extra busywork.
So, what are the pros and cons of merging and rebasing Pros and Cons Merging Pros Simple to use and understand. Maybe a bug in SourceTree From the command line, change directories to your repo, then run git rebase -continue. You can turn fast-forward merges off in SourceTree so that a merge commit is always created if you want check the ‘Create a commit’ option in the Merge dialog or set it globally in Preferences > Git. This breaks my brain every time I have to deal with it, because I invariably choose the wrong one based on my interpretation of the language. rebase atlassian-sourcetree Share Improve this question Follow asked at 11:27 Sergiodela 33 6 1 You might need to open the command line for this one, then. By the end of this tutorial, youll be familiar with commands that will let you restructure your Git commits, and be able to avoid pitfalls that are commonly encountered when rewriting history. It lets you perform a single rebase operation of your Pull Request commits on top of your base branch and then. Also available for other repository managers such as GitLab, it’s the rebase front door.
These options give you powerful work flow customization options. In September 2016, GitHub introduced a new way to merge pull requests: the Rebase and merge button. In particular, the meaning of “mine” and “theirs” seems to be semantically variable depending on the context in which the conflict has occurred.įor example, “mine” and “theirs” may take on opposite meanings depending whether I'm applying a stash, doing a pull with rebase, a merge, etc. These mechanisms include: Commit -amend, git rebase and git reflog. I routinely make errors while resolving merge conflicts due to the seemingly inscrutable naming of the “ Resolve Using Theirs” and “ Resolve Using Mine” commands.
0 kommentar(er)
